Sunday, November 18, 2012

An Anthological History of Cannibalism



            Cannibalism is an action, or lifestyle, that westerners often have an incredibly hard time observing objectively. While westerners can often understand cultural differences in family hierarchy, religions, and marriage, cannibalism is a ritual that many people find simply appalling. The reason for this is two fold; first, many representations of cannibalism are often shallow in scope, and second, because psychologists say that cannibalism is the most primitive and dominating form of violence.

            First, cannibalism is often portrayed through western lenses that fail to report the many reasons people cannibalize. Cannibalism is a form of aggression, but that is not its sole cause. Cannibalism is a funerary tradition as well as a sign of love in some cultures. Many groups of cannibalism have cannibalism as a way to honor a deceased person’s body. This is a view that is often not reported through the media.
         
           Some people who cannibalize also see it as a sign of affection or love; consuming a person means they are inside of you, and a ‘part’ of you. This is an opinion that is really interesting and contradicts much of western thought. The Abrahamic faiths would never encourage this because it negates their doctrine about the soul’s ascent to heaven.

             A last reason is survival- while many anthologists report this cause, viewing it objectively is difficult. Many Europeans argue that they would never eat their own child or wife- they fail to empathize with the survivalist mental state famine encourages, and they forget how differing social structures would permit this. In a society where certain members may have no ‘dignity’ or value, it is acceptable to eat them for sustained. While this opinion is ‘hard’ to identify with, and many would say is flat out evil or wrong, an anthropologist must realize that cannibalism has many reasons, and in certain cultures is seen as an acceptable or even a good thing.

            Furthermore, psychologists say that cannibalism, when done as an act of aggression, is the most violent way to dominate a person. While many say that rape is a way to dominate a person first and sexual second, cannibalism is on another level of aggression. There is no way to overpower and subjugate a person more than murdering them and consuming them (sad I know). This is why many horrific mass murders have cannibalized their victims; many psychologists say that cannibalism is a ‘last resort’ to dominate when other forms of violence lose their initial satisfaction.

            What does this have to do with the Korowai people? They eat people, and are famous for it. Why? This Smithsonian article articulates the reasoning in its complete thought.




“After we eat a dinner of river fish and rice, Boas joins me in a hut and sits cross-legged on the thatched floor, his dark eyes reflecting the gleam from my flashlight, our only source of light. Using Kembaren as translator, he explains why the Korowai kill and eat their fellow tribesmen. It's because of the khakhua, which comes disguised as a relative or friend of a person he wants to kill. "The khakhua eats the victim's insides while he sleeps," Boas explains, "replacing them with fireplace ash so the victim does not know he's being eaten. The khakhua finally kills the person by shooting a magical arrow into his heart." When a clan member dies, his or her male relatives and friends seize and kill the khakhua. "Usually, the [dying] victim whispers to his relatives the name of the man he knows is the khakhua," Boas says. "He may be from the same or another treehouse." I ask Boas whether the Korowai eat people for any other reason or eat the bodies of enemies they've killed in battle. "Of course not," he replies, giving me a funny look. "We don't eat humans, we only eat khakhua."The killing and eating of khakhua has reportedly declined among tribespeople in and near the settlements. Rupert Stasch, an anthropologist at Reed College in Portland, Oregon, who has lived among the Korowai for 16 months and studied their culture, writes in the journal Oceania that Korowai say they have "given up" killing witches partly because they were growing ambivalent about the practice and partly in reaction to several incidents with police. In one in the early '90s, Stasch writes, a Yaniruma man killed his sister's husband for being a khakhua. The police arrested the killer, an accomplice and a village head. "The police rolled them around in barrels, made them stand overnight in a leech-infested pond, and forced them to eat tobacco, chili peppers, animal feces, and unripe papaya," he writes. Word of such treatment, combined with Korowais' own ambivalence, prompted some to limit witch-killing even in places where police do not venture. Still, the eating of khakhua persists, according to my guide, Kembaren. "Many khakhua are murdered and eaten each year," he says, citing information he says he has gained from talking to Korowai who still live in treehouses.”

Clearly, the beliefs they have about the Kembaren lead them to accept and promote this practice. The anthropological lesson here is simple; the reasons for rituals like cannibalism are diverse.

No comments:

Post a Comment